Tampilkan postingan dengan label doping. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label doping. Tampilkan semua postingan

Selasa, 01 Maret 2016

Micro-RNAs (miRNAs) - What are They? Why are They Hot Doping Candidates for the 2020s? How do They Work?

Methylation is the most common form of in vivo miRNA modification (the Scientist)
Micro-RNAs aka miRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level... What? I suppose you have heard of epigenetics? Well, miRNA molecules also play a role in epigenetics by triggering "post-transcriptional" changes, i.e. in between the transcription and the translation of a gene.

It is thus not surprising that there is growing evidence that they are involved in a plethora of biological processes - biological processes in the course of which they occur naturally, processes like exercise, for example.
If you want to build muscle forget T-booster and optimize your protein intake 

Protein Timing DOES Matter!

5x More Than the FDA Allows!

Protein requ. of athletes

High EAA protein for fat loss

Fast vs. slow protein

Whey vs. Pea Protein
More recently, scientists have found out more and more about the way miRNAs play a decisive role in the adaptations that occur in the hours and days after you train. They are involved in protein synthesis, mitochondrial biogenesis, muscle repair and all the other processes you want to accelerate or improve n matter if your are doing resistance, endurance or any other exercise.

Figure 1: Specific miRNAs that are currently being pursued as clinical candidates. A subset of the miRNAs of which inhibition has shown therapeutic promise and that are currently actively being pursued as clinical candidates for various disease indications (van Rooij. 2012)
In view of the increasing evidence that miRNAs trigger, block or facilitate many of the various beneficial responses to exercise and promote the regenerative processes that start at the very moment you rack the weights, it can hardly be surprising that that miRNA modulating supplements or drugs are on the top list of "drugs-to-develop" of many researchers.

As of now, however, the focus is on the usual suspects (see Figure 1) like battling Hepatitis C with MiR-122, preventing or reversing cardiac remodeling with MiR-208, soothing inflammation with MiR-155, controlling or even reversing MiR-21, clearing or preventing atherosclerosis with MiR-92a, battling metabolic disease with MiR-33 or MiR-103/107, treating myeloproliferative diseases (non-leukemia proliferation of blood cells) with MiR-45 and triggering cardiac regeneration and repairing injury with MiR-15.
miRNA-related patent distribution in the United States (1661 in total | van Rooij. 2016). Although the miRNA-related patent documents spanned over 60 IPC code categories, almost half of them were not miRNA drugs, but rather patents of technolgies that allow for their successful delivery.
How far are we with developing miRNA-drugs? The development of drugs, which are designed to either act as analogs or block the function of miRNA, has progressed significantly over the past years. The overview of the various patents that had been filed in the US for years ago, already, indicates that (van Rooij. 2016 | Figure on the left). The majorit of filings are yet agents / methods needed to deliver or produce corresponding agents. "Only" 12% of the patents include actual miRNA regulating drugs. Among these you will find straight miRNA molecules, as well as compounds targeting miRNAs, and methods of regulating RNA interference. Likewise on the list are patent filings directed to multiple therapeutic uses of specific miRNA molecules comprised the majority of the general treatment methods group. They account for 11% of the patent documents categorized in the Figure on the lest. Applications and patents disclosing diagnostic uses for miRNAs represented a fourth larger category on the list of the US patent office.
In view of the plethora of potential applications, it should be obvious that it would go way beyond the scope of this article to address all potential drug targets. Accordingly, I am going to focus on the state of the art in exercise related miRNA related research - research that has as of now, not yet produced an FDA-approved performance booster, but could certainly be the future of legal and illegal performance enhancers.
Table 1: MicroRNAs and acute exercise. Resistance Exercise (RE); Endurance Exercise (EE); Human (H); Mouse (M); Rat (R); 1 Repetition maximum (1RM); Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max); Maximal power output (Pmax); Individual anaerobic threshold (IAT); No Change (NC | Meurer. 2016).
Recently, Meurer et al. have published the above overview (Table 1) of pertinent research in the German medicinal journal "Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportsmedicine" (Meurer. 2016). The tabular overview reflects what I hinted at previously: Simply supplementing with certain miRNAs will not cut it.
Figure 2: In a 2011 study, scientists observed that differences in the miRNA response to a std. resistance training protocol explained the differential effects on leg muscle mass (Davidsen. 2011).
Why? Well, let's take the example of Davidson's 2011 study in elderly humans (#1 on the list): In said study, the subjects who reacted with the least significant muscle gains to a standardized resistance training had significantly higher miRNA-451 and lower miRNA-378 levels. Any doping agent that would counter this disadvantage would thus have to have the ability boost miRNA-251 and block or lower miRNA-379 - of these, only the former could be done by supplementing straight miRNA-451 in a bioavailable form; to reduce the levels or block the effects of miRNA-378, however, it would take a different agent, one that blocks the effects or production of miRNA-378. If scientists found an agent or a drug combination that could do both, however, it could more than quadruple the muscle gains in a certain part of the population (whether it would also double the gains of young(er) individuals would have to be seen, but it's unlikely it would be completely useless).

Other studies, suggest that circulating miRNA, such as miRNA-486, which appears to be involved in the improvements in insulin sensitivity in response to exercise (Aoi. 2013), have similar important roles in the regulatory mechanisms that are induced by exercise. The mechanisms that are illustrated in Figure 3, are putative and based on the theory that miRNAs, much like cell-based hormones, facilitate a direct cell-to-cell communication and are therefore being secreted into the circulation, where they target neighboring cells to exert a paracrine functions (Chen. 2012).
Figure 3: MicroRNAs are secreted into circulation via multiple carriers, including exosomes, microvesicles and apoptotic bodies or bound to proteins like HDL (high density lipoprotein) and RNA-binding proteins (RBP). This provides protection from RNases and thus degradation when delivered into circulation. C-miRNAs are thought to be released or leaked into circulation in response to stress, injury or tissue damage. Though, the exact release mechanisms (active/passive) as well as uptake of microRNAs into multivesicular bodies (MVB) are still in need for clarification (Meurer. 2016).
As you can see in Figure 3, miRNAs are either incorporated into vesicular structures like exosomes, microvesicles and apoptotic bodies or bound to proteins like HDL and RNA-binding proteins that are carrying around in your blood and give them the ability to exert hormone-like actions. Unfortunately, the "packaging" and transportation of miRNAs is yet another of several not yet fully understood aspects of the ways in which miRNAs work their muscle building, fat burning and disease curing magic - aspects that will have to be elucidated before the age miRNA drugs and doping can begin.
By the means of anti-miRNA treatments scientists are already able to control the myofiber density of artificial human skeletal muscle; by other switches enhance their contractile properties and more (Cheng. 2016). 
We are not yet there, but... Even though respective drugs are still in the development pipeline of laboratories all across the world, the way they will (one day) be able to alleviate the hypertrophy break, help remodel skeletal muscle, improve regeneration or boost mitochondrial biogenesis leaves no doubt that functional miRNA drugs could be the most popular doping agents of the 2020s. In engineered human muscles, for example, Cheng et al. (2016) have already demonstrated that the inhibition of microRNA-133a will enhance the differentiation of muscle cells and thus increase muscle density in the petri-dish. And let's be honest: This result is too promising to believe that corresponding drugs are being developed and maybe even tested in human guinea pigs at the very moment that I write this article | Comment!
References:
  • Aoi, Wataru, et al. "Muscle-enriched microRNA miR-486 decreases in circulation in response to exercise in young men." Front Physiol 4 (2013): 80.
  • Chen, Xi, et al. "Secreted microRNAs: a new form of intercellular communication." Trends in cell biology 22.3 (2012): 125-132.
  • Cheng, Cindy Sue, et al. "Cell density and joint microRNA-133a and microRNA-696 inhibition enhance differentiation and contractile function of engineered human skeletal muscle tissues." Tissue Engineering ja (2016).
  • Davidsen, Peter K., et al. "High responders to resistance exercise training demonstrate differential regulation of skeletal muscle microRNA expression." Journal of Applied Physiology 110.2 (2011): 309-317.
  • Meurer, S., K. Krüger, and F. C. Mooren. "MicroRNAs and Exercise." Dtsch Z Sportmed 67 (2016): 27-34.
  • van Rooij, Eva, Angela L. Purcell, and Arthur A. Levin. "Developing microRNA therapeutics." Circulation research 110.3 (2012): 496-507.

Rabu, 30 Desember 2015

Ecdysterone Beats Popular Anabolics!? Plus 75% Muscle Size in 21 Days in Rats - More Than DHT, IGF-1, Dianabol...

Parr et al. suggest that ecdysterone should be added to the WADA list.
Actually, I didn't plan to write a SuppVersity article about an agent of which everybody says that it's a waste of money, but I have to admit that the conclusion that "ecdysterone exhibited a strong hypertrophic effect on the fiber size of rat soleus muscle that was found even stronger compared to the test compounds metandienone (dianabol), estradienedione (trenbolox), and SARM S 1, all administered in the same dose (5 mg/kg body weight, for 21 days)" (Parr. 2015) in the abstract of a recent non-sponsored (no conflict of interest, either) study from the Freie Universität Berlin intrigued me.

In the corresponding study, Parr and colleagues had tested the effects of ecdysterones on the fiber sizes of the soleus muscle (that's mainly slow twitch muscle fibers) of rodents in vivo and in vitro.
If you want to build muscle forget T-booster and optimize your protein intake 

Protein Timing DOES Matter!

5x More Than the FDA Allows!

Protein requ. of athletes

High EAA protein for fat loss

Fast vs. slow protein

Whey vs. Pea Protein
In the less relevant in vitro study, the researchers incubated C2C12 derived myotubes with the test compounds and determination of diameters of 47 myotubes per group (mean of measurements every 10–20 µm along the myotube) by fixing the cells and using photographs of the stained cells to determine the myotube diameters of 50 myotubes every 10–20 µm along the length of the myotube (further details see Parr. 2014). As the authors point out, incubation with ecdysterone showed "sign. increased myotube diameters compared to vehicle treated control cells" (Parr. 2015 | see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Myotube diameter in the in vitro study after incubation with DHT, IGF-1 or Ecdysterone (Parr. 2015).
If you compare the effects of the Ecdy treatment with those of the endogenous anabolic androgenic steroid dihydrotestosterone at the same concentration and those of the anabolic growth factor IGF-1 (concentration for comparison was 1.3 nM) it is quite impressive to see that there was an (albeit non significant) advantage for an active phytoecdysteroid the Russians have supposedly used as early as in the 1980s for doping purposes.
How does ecdysterone work? Previous studies already confirmed the beneficial effects of ecdysterone on skeletal muscle protein synthesis. As early as in the year 2000, V.N. Syrov published a paper in the Pharmeceutical Chemistry Journal in which the beneficial effects ecdysterone and related agents on rodent muscles were documented. Later on, Gorelick-Feldman et al. proposed direct or indirect stimulation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway as mechanism for this increased protein synthesis (Gorelick-Feldman. 2008 & 2010). In the study at hand, Parr et al conducted molecular modeling experiments which appear to confirm that the effects of ecydesterone are mediated by estrogen-receptor-β (ERβ) binding, rather than via the androgen receptor which is the target of the many of the other drugs used. 
Obviously, the effects of bathing individual cells in concentrated ecdysterone cannot serve as a reliable litmus test for the anabolic prowess of an agent bodybuilders take as an oral supplement in dosages of usually no more than 1g per day. In this respect, the concomitantly conducted experiment with intact rodents is of much greater interest. In this part of study, the authors fed male Wistar rats (n = 42, Janvier, Le-Genest St-Isle, France) either 5 mg/kg body weight of ecdysterone, metandienone, estradienedione, or the selective androgen receptor modulatar (SARM) S-1, each diluted in a solution of 20% DMSO and 80% peanut oil daily. In that, it is unfortunately not 100% quite clear if the scientists used intraperitoneal or intra-muscular injections, but the composition of the "supplement" and the fact that a previous study (Syrov. 2000) used the same dosage orally, appear to suggest that Parr et al. refer to about IP injections, which mimic oral supplementation, but have the advantage of giving rodents no chance to regurgitate the drug, when they write that the rodents "received injections". What is pretty clear, though, is that the scientists used changes in muscle fiber size of the soleus muscle of male Wistar rats as measure of the anabolic potency of their test substances.
Figure 2: Anabolic effect of ecdysterone (Ecdy) expressed as fiber size of soleus muscle in intact rats (Parr. 2015).
The results of the comparison of ecdysterone to the anabolic androgenic steroids metandienone (dianabol) and estradienedione (trenbolox) as well as the selective androgen receptor modulator S-1 are plotted in Figure 2. Quite impressive , no? And this is not an outlier study. As Parr et al point out, their study is not the first to show that "ecdysterone induces hypertrophy of muscles with a comparable or even higher potency as shown for anabolic androgenic steroids, SARMs or IGF-1", as analogous findings have been reported in the previously cited study by Syrov back in 2000. Human data, as well as data that would confirm similar effects on muscles that are predominantly fast-twitch (the soleus which was examined in the study at hand is mostly slow twitch) are yet missing. The latter is of particular interest, because estrogen treatment appears to favor a more oxidative (=more slow vs. fast twitch) fiber muscle fiber composition (Suzuki. 1985).
Hormonal Response to Exercise, Revisited: A Consequence, not a Determinant of Your Mood, Effort & Performance | learn more
Bottom line: In spite of the fact that the study provides quite convincing evidence in favor of the unexpected potency of Ecdysterone, there is a problem with dosing. While the scientists say they used 5mg/kg body weight in order "mimic the situation in athletes", the correct rodent equivalent of the aforementioned dosages of up to 1g per day would be roughly 50-75mg/kg per day and thus far more than the meager 5mg/kg the researchers used.

In other words, if they didn't accidentally give us the human equivalen dose instead of the actual rodent dose, those 1g/day some bodybuilders may be taking should be way more than you'd need to see significant increases in muscle gains and that is a problem.

Why? Well, not because I'd believe that dosages as high may have toxic side effects, but rather in view of the fact that you can hardly imagine that a drug as effective as that wouldn't be all over the place in the discussions on pertinent bulletin boards. A 2006 study by Wilborn et al. even fuels the doubts, because it found no performance or hypertrophy effects in the 15 out of 45 subject of their 8-week training study who consumed 30 mg of 20-hydroxyecdysone per day from an allegedly standardized (but not tested) extract from Suma root. An even older study by Simakin et al. (1988), however, appears to confirm the existence of potent anabolic effects of ecdysterone in humans with significant increases in lean (6-7%) and reductions in fat mass (10%) in a 3-week study on 78 highly-trained male and female subjects. In view of the conflicting evidence, I am still very skeptical whether (a) the results translate to human beings, whether (b) the growth promoting effect is maybe restricted to slow twitch fibers and thus of little use to bodybuilders and whether (c) the supplements that are already being sold actually contain ecdysterones | Comment!
References:
  • Gorelick-Feldman, Jonathan, et al. "Phytoecdysteroids increase protein synthesis in skeletal muscle cells." Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 56.10 (2008): 3532-3537.
  • Gorelick-Feldman, Jonathan, Wendie Cohick, and Ilya Raskin. "Ecdysteroids elicit a rapid Ca 2+ flux leading to Akt activation and increased protein synthesis in skeletal muscle cells." Steroids 75.10 (2010): 632-637.
  • Parr, Maria Kristina, et al. "Estrogen receptor beta is involved in skeletal muscle hypertrophy induced by the phytoecdysteroid ecdysterone." Molecular nutrition & food research 58.9 (2014): 1861-1872.
  • Parr, M. K., et al. "Ecdysteroids: A novel class of anabolic agents?." Biology of sport 32.2 (2015): 169.
  • Simakin, S. Yu. "The Combined Use of Ecdisten and the Product'Bodrost'during Training in Cyclical Types of Sport." Scientific Sports Bulletin 2 (1988).
  • Suzuki, S., and T. Yamamuro. "Long-term effects of estrogen on rat skeletal muscle." Experimental neurology 87.2 (1985): 291-299.
  • Syrov, V. N. "Comparative experimental investigation of the anabolic activity of phytoecdysteroids and steranabols." Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal 34.4 (2000): 193-197.
  • Wilborn, Colin D., et al. "Effects of methoxyisoflavone, ecdysterone, and sulfo-polysaccharide supplementation on training adaptations in resistance-trained males." Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 3.2 (2006): 19-27.

Minggu, 25 Oktober 2015

First Study to Demonstrate Ergogenic Effects of Metformin - 14% Increased Time to Exhaustion in Standardized Supra-Maximal Cycling Test With 500mg of Ordinary Metformin

With the publication of Learsi's latest paper the list of things metformin can do for you has just gotten been expanded with another item: Doping!
You will probably remember my article about the potential, but unproven ergogenic effects of AMPK mimetics (read it). Well, as it is often the case, a new study is released only days after you've published a review of the existing literature. Oftentimes that's not really relevant, but in the case of the latest study from the Federal University of Alagoas this may be different. After all, we are dealing with a human study in  ten healthy, physically active, but non-athletic subjects with a mean (±SD) maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) o 38.6 ± 4.5 mL/kg per min who performed (i) an incremental test; (ii) six submaximal constant workload tests at 40%-90% V O2max; and (iii) two supramaximal tests (110% V O2max).

All tests were performed twice once with a placebo supplement and once with 500mg of metformin. Both, the placebo and the metformin supplement were ingested 60 minutes before the supramaximal test, in order to investigate the hypothesis that metformin would increase anaerobic capacity and performance during high-intensity, short-duration exercise.
Like antioxidants metformin could blunt the hormetic response & long-term(!) adaptation

Is Vitamin E Good for the Sedentary Slob, Only?

Even Ice-Baths Impair the Adapt. Process

Vit C+E Impair Muscle Gains in Older Men

C+E Useless or Detrimental for Healthy People

Vitamin C and Glucose Management?

Antiox. & Health Benefits Don't Correlate
The authors, Learsi et al. (2015), based this hypothesis on the fact that metformin inhibits aerobic pathway energy production and so the glycolytic energy system could be overloaded during ATP production for muscle contraction.
Figure 1: Overview of the study design. The active / placebo treatment, i.e. 500mg of metformin or an identically looking placebo were administered 60 min before the supramaximal tests. The whole procedure was repeated twice, with at least 72h between the first and the second testing session (Learsi. 2015).
The aim was thus to to determine the effects of metformin on anaerobic capacity and to elucidate whether metformin has any ergogenic effect in intense, short-duration exercise in healthy, physically active men.
Is this really the first study? Yes, it is the first to prove metformin's ergogenic effects in humans. It's yet not the first human study to test the ergogenic effects of metformin. 2008 Johnson et al. made the mistake to assume that taking metformin would affect the VO2max, or ventilatory threshold. Just like Gudat et al. before them, Johnson et al. simply missed the most straight forward practical measure of exercise performance, i.e. total time to exhaustion, while focusing on things like VO2 (Johnson et al. 2008) or lactate (Gudat et al. 1997) which are nice to explain increases in performance, but - if we are honest - still irrelevant, when all that really counts is how fast you run, how long you cycle or how hard you hit.
While many of the variables they assessed didn't change, the already hinted at 14% increase in maximal endurance (see headline) is something that may make the difference between winning an Olympic medal and placing fourth or worse.
Figure 2: Changes in time to exhaustion and EPOC, both stat. significantly w/ metformin (Learsi. 2015).
What is also noteworthy is that the subjects excess post-exercise energy consumption, which was measured for (unfortunately) only 10 min, increased significantly, as well (see Figure 2, right). In contrast to what some bro-scientists may tell you that does not necessarily equal increased fat loss, but it's still interesting, because it may suggest that metformin improved the subjects' performance by increasing the supply of energy via the anaerobic alactic system, i.e. by boosting the efficacy of non-glucose- and thus non-lactic-acid-dependent energy pathways - in short: fat oxidation.
Alpha Lipoic Acid, GABA, Taurine, Green Tea, Gooseberry & Fenugreek. Plus: Metformin the No.1 Drug? Supplements to Improve and Restore Insulin Sensitivity - Read the First Installment of This Series | read more
Bottom line: This is the first human study to confirm that the AMPK-booster and frequently prescribed diabetes drug can trigger statistically and practically relevant increases in endurance performance during a supra-maximal VO2 max test. If we assume that a similar performance increase occurs in trained athletes, the Learsi study makes taking a bunch of grandma's metformin pills before the next race quite attractive. For the WADA, however, it means that they will have to watch and test for yet another commonly prescribed and readily available medication. And last but not least, for the "wonder-drug" metformin, it is yet another area of application: athletic performance enhancement or as we usually call it "doping" | Comment on Facebook!
References:
  • Gudat, U., G. Convent, and L. Heinemann. "Metformin and exercise: no additive effect on blood lactate levels in healthy volunteers." Diabetic medicine 14.2 (1997): 138-142.
  • Johnson, S. T., et al. "Acute effect of metformin on exercise capacity in active males." Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 10.9 (2008): 747-754.
  • Learsi, et al. "Metformin improves performance in high-intensity exercise, but not anaerobic capacity." in healthy male subjects." Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2015 Aug 7. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12474. [Epub ahead of print]